Four Tips to Avoid or Handle Office Actions

Oct 25, 2021

Four Tips to Avoid or Handle Office Actions
Responding to an office action can cost patent applicants an average of $3,000. Naturally, both patent applicants and patent attorneys strive to avoid office actions whenever possible or, alternatively, handle them effectively and efficiently. LexisNexis® Intellectual Property has developed patent prosecution tools that can help prevent and overcome USPTO rejections and objections. Here are four tips for using LexisNexis IP products to your advantage.

1. Do Your Research

There is no need to sell patent professionals on the value of preliminary patentability searches. Patent searches help practitioners evaluate an invention’s novelty and non-obviousness before getting too deep into the patent process. Understanding the prior art references that could impact patentability is invaluable because it helps to manage client expectations, and it helps patent practitioners draft their patent applications to minimize the risk of rejection by a USPTO patent examiner. All said, the value that can be extracted from patent search results depends on the quality of the patent search. Search tools like the LexisNexis TotalPatent One® patent search platform enable quality patent searches by providing access to full-text patent records from global patent authorities, as well as intuitive user interfaces that help quickly identify on-point prior art references.

See how to gain greater access to patent records with TotalPatent One®.

TotalPatent One

2. Review Your Applications

Thoroughly reviewing patent application drafts before submitting them to the USPTO helps catch errors and mistakes that can lead to office actions and delays in patent prosecution. However, thorough patent reviews can be quite expensive. After all, time is money, and reviewing patent drafts carefully for quality issues can be a slow and tedious process when done manually. Fortunately, the LexisNexis PatentOptimizer® patent drafting tool saves users both time and money by conducting patent draft evaluations with the click of a button. PatentOptimizer® reviews for common clerical and drafting issues, many substantive and procedural issues such as those relating to Section 112 written description and enablement requirements, proper labeling and descriptions of patent drawings and the use of consistent terminology patent sections.

Explore how to create high-quality patent applications.


3. Understand Patent Examiner Variability (and Be Easy on Yourself)

No matter how much care and attention patent practitioners give to the patent research and drafting phases of the patent process, it is important to remember that obstacles are sometimes unavoidable. One of the key insights arising from LexisNexis PatentAdvisor® patent analytics is that the “difficulty” of USPTO patent examiners can vary greatly from one patent examiner to the next. Understanding patent examiner variability means understanding that the course of prosecution depends greatly on the patent examiner assigned to evaluate the underlying patent application. Rather than feeling frustrated when an office action is issued, remember that obstacles are part of the journey, and that modern patent prosecution tools like PatentAdvisor™ can help develop strategies to overcome the challenges that are faced.

Learn about patent analytics and the three personalities of patent prosecution. Watch the on-demand webinar Patent Prosecution Analytics: No Longer Just a Nice to Have.


4. Leverage Tested Office Action Responses

Attorney work product is rarely developed from scratch, so why should responses to office actions be any different? After all, the USPTO database is full of patent file wrappers containing office actions that were successfully overcome. The odds are good that any rejection presented by your patent examiner has an analog in the USPTO archives that can be used to develop a successful response. The PatentOptimizer® Office Action Response (OAR) tool searches patent records to uncover instances where other patent applicants faced and overcame similar patent rejections. The OAR tool provides tried-and-tested counterarguments that can be easily incorporated into a user’s office action response.

Learn more on how to generate office action responses.

Office Action Response Tool
A great scenario in patent prosecution is avoiding office actions. If that isn’t possible, and an office action is issued, it is best to handle it effectively and efficiently. LexisNexis Intellectual Property provides the tools that can help prevent or overcome USPTO rejections and objections.

Learn more about TotalPatent One and find training resources here.

Learn more about PatentOptimizer and find training resources here.

Learn more about PatentAdvisor and find training resource here.

Learn more about the PatentOptimizer Office Action Response Tool and download the datasheet.


New Call-to-action

Response to Office Actions—Weighing Options

Contrary to many clients’ perceptions, it is always open to interpretation whether an invention deserves patent protection. Every USPTO patent examiner is unique in their outlook and opinions, and have their own way of interpreting the patentability of a specific...

Use Patent Data to Understand USPTO Examiners

Getting to know someone is hard and getting to the level of really understanding someone takes even more effort . . . usually. When it comes to patent prosecution, patent data and analytics make the process to understand USPTO examiners easier than ever. Here are a...

Infographic: Traditional vs. Modern Online Brand Protection Technologies

Brands are built on trust. People need to feel assured that every interaction with your brand is 100% authentic, but that’s harder than ever to ensure. With eCommerce and social media permeating almost all aspects of our society, the online consumer base...

Anatomy of an Office Action: Reduce Client Costs with LexisNexis PatentOptimizer®

The idea that we should focus our attention on things that are within our control and worry little about the things that are not, is a philosophy that spans ages. It is also a philosophy that is particularly valuable in patent prosecution. Patent professionals have...