Chris explains the concept of the “alignment report,” a software tool for determining whether a company or law firm’s prosecution performance is in line with what is normal at the USPTO. As he and Megan discuss the goals and potential pitfalls of such data comparisons, they discover that the most challenging step is actually selecting which applications to include in the comparison. Many patent practitioners make the mistake of defining the application set too broadly, to include applications from vastly different technology areas. This can result in unfair comparisons: for example, comparing a law firm that only works on software patents with one that works on mechanical patents.

Join Our Podcast Email List

 

We’ll send you an email every time there’s a new episode published.

Related Content

#54: Shades of Red Chris talks with Megan about his recent experience deciding how to respond to a first office action. He discovered that his application has ended up w...
#53: A Patent Examiner’s Take on ETA Having devoted years to developing examiner metrics that are both accurate and fair, Chris and Megan figured it made sense to ask for an examiner's pe...
#52: Inside Scoop with Former Patent Examiner Joshua Rudawitz Megan interviews patent attorney Josh Rudawitz about his experience as a patent examiner. Josh discusses his career path at the USPTO and shares valua...
[if lte IE 8]
[if lte IE 8]

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. Cookie Policy

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close