Chris explains the concept of the “alignment report,” a software tool for determining whether a company or law firm’s prosecution performance is in line with what is normal at the USPTO. As he and Megan discuss the goals and potential pitfalls of such data comparisons, they discover that the most challenging step is actually selecting which applications to include in the comparison. Many patent practitioners make the mistake of defining the application set too broadly, to include applications from vastly different technology areas. This can result in unfair comparisons: for example, comparing a law firm that only works on software patents with one that works on mechanical patents.

Join Our Podcast Email List

 

We’ll send you an email every time there’s a new episode published.

Related Content

#47 Patent Analytics: Table Stakes for Law Firms Chris interviews Ken Gemmill, Business Operations Manager for LexisNexis IP. In his career, Ken has witnessed the birth of analytics entering the pate...
#46 Troubled Patents: Should We Get Aggressive or Give Up? Chris shares an experience from an Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) Regional Conference where he sat on a panel representing the p...
#44: Can I Please Get A New Patent Examiner? Chris and Megan discuss the challenges of getting a new examiner by filing a continuation application. In spite of the difficulties, this strategy has...
[if lte IE 8]
[if lte IE 8]

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. Cookie Policy

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close