Using Statistics to Gather Patent Examiner Intel

Jun 9, 2021

Using Statistics to Gather Patent Examiner Intel

Patent professionals maintain an interesting relationship with their assigned patent examiners. From one perspective, it is perfectly amicable. Patent examiners are generally cooperative and unbiased; they stick to examining procedure, and even if the rejections they issue end up reducing the scope of a patent’s protection, it often becomes stronger in the process. The flipside of this relationship is that USPTO patent examiners are also obstacles that must be overcome before a patent will issue. Most patent examiners do not harbor a vendetta against patent applicants, but USPTO patent examiners do vary quite drastically from one another in their experience levels, predispositions and difficulties relative to other examiners. No matter which view you take on your patent examiner, USPTO patent and statistics can help you better understand them and can help the patent process play out as smoothly as possible. 

Reviewing a Patent Examiner’s Patent Prosecution History 

Historical patent data can paint a vivid picture of a patent examiner’s career at the USPTO. Patent statistics, such as an examiner’s allowance rate or the average office actions they issue per patent application, can help patent practitioners manage client expectations and devise appropriate patent prosecution strategies. However, most patent statistics are presented as career averages, and patent examiner decisions can trend up or down at different points in their careers. As a result, patent professionals can learn a lot from USPTO patent statistics, but each statistic should be taken with a dose of caution and context before it is relied on. 

Image-Patent Examiner Intel

Predicting a Patent Examiner’s Future Actions 

Where career patent statistics fail in their ability to predict the future, more advanced patent metrics have the potential to succeed. The best patent metric for predicting examiner behavior is currently the PatentAdvisor ETA™, which is based on a proprietary algorithm that factors in the circumstances surrounding each patent examiner. The PatentAdvisor ETA patent metric is unique in that it takes into account each patent examiner’s experience level, their trends in decisionmaking and the actions they have recently taken on patent applications that are still pending (not just those that have been granted or abandoned). Examiners with low ETA values are preferable to patent applicants, and patent professionals who face patent examiners with high ETA values should buckle up for a lengthy and challenging journey. 

Image 2-Patent Examiner Intel

Determining the Present Course of Action in Patent Prosecution 

What good is predicting the future if nothing can be done about it? Knowing you are up against a difficult patent examiner is helpful to an extent, but USPTO patent data can also be used to identify the best actions for a patent professional to take to successfully and efficiently navigate patent prosecution. For example, USPTO patent statistics can show us when an early appeal could avoid responding to several additional office actions, while also offering the best opportunity for receiving a patent. Patent statistics can also reveal key insights, such as that a patent examiner has historically responded well to Requests for Continued Examination (RCEs) or to something as simple as an interview, which can make a positive impact on the patent process.  

 Patent data is a powerful tool for understanding each patent examiner, whether friend or foe. The LexisNexis PatentAdvisor® patent analytics platform communicates information to its users that adds clarity and detail about the USPTO employees who determine the fates of patent applications. Whether looking retroactively at an examiner’s track record, predicting their future or developing a patent prosecution strategy, PatentAdvisor™ users can lean on patent statistics and proprietary metrics to prosecute efficiently and effectively. 


Learn more about PatentAdvisor ETA by downloading the data sheet or accessing this article: Predicting Examiner Behavior with PatentAdvisor ETA™. 

LexisNexis PatentAdvisor®

Two-Day Trial

Get to know your examiner better with more context and a deeper understanding of your examiner’s behavior than ever available before.

With your free trial, you will gain instant access to:

Examiner Search allows you to search by examiner name for a filterable, examiner specific dashboard of patent analytics, including rejection specific statistics, appeal statistics, prosecution statistics, interview statistics, a backlog of RCEs and timeline.

QuickPair easily replaces the USPTO Public PAIR by providing the most robust application details anywhere, including examiner timeline, examiner allowance rate and the average time and number of office actions to allowance.

PatentAdvisor, the first-ever data-driven patent strategy tool, provides a systemic approach to crafting an effective prosecution strategy. Understand why certain patent applications take longer than others to reach allowance—then use that knowledge to devise better patent prosecution strategies.

Free Trial

Latest IP News & Analysis:

Prior Art Research

Conducting prior art research before filing a patent application can have a profound influence on patent strategies and outcomes. Not only can understanding prior art help to determine whether an invention is patentable, but it can also inform how a patent application...

Patent Analysis Tools for Objective Application Review

Why is it so hard to be objective when reviewing our work? For patent practitioners, a comprehensive, objective application review before it is submitted to the USPTO—a check on both substance and form—can help to avoid many headaches down the road. Yet, despite the...

The Rise of Systemic Abuse Networks

A version of this article originally appeared on It’s no secret brand abuse is on the rise. To get a clearer picture of the nature of this increase, Appdetex examined domain enforcement activity from a sample of their clients.  They found that, on...

Patent Data Quality for Reliable Legal Opinions

Having access to accurate and complete patent data is imperative for any patent professional looking to provide exceptional service to their clients. When patent professionals provide counsel based on incomplete patent information, the reliability of their opinions...

Evaluate Patent Records Early in the Patent Process

Patent analysis is not just something to be done once throughout the patent process. Analyses of prior art references, patent drafts and patent examiner data all have their place and provide their own unique insights that help patent professionals better serve their...

On-Demand Webinar: Patent Prosecution Analytics: No Longer Just a Nice to Have

What you’ll learn in this webinar:Types of IndefinitenessLearn about the types of problems that patent applications face and what patent practitioners should do.Nautilus and Its ProgenyGet a look inside the Nautilus, Inc. ruling and a view of where we stand today with...