Myths of Litigated Patents

Dec 29, 2020

Featured Image-Myths of Litigated Patents

In the world of patent analytics, patent data serves two primary purposes. For one, it acts as a snapshot of the past, helping to show history in the form of patent statistics pertaining to the USPTO, patent examiners and patent applicants. The second key function of patent data is that it helps us identify meaningful correlations we can use to help predict future outcomes, and to react to those predictions in a meaningful way. LexisNexis® IP is known for identifying examiner characteristics, such as their experience levels and patent allowance rates, to name a few, and using those characteristics to help predict the events that will arise in patent prosecution.  

Dr. Shine (Sean) Tu, Professor of Law at the West Virginia University College of Law, researched whether patent examiner characteristics can provide insight into whether a patent that is issued will ultimately be litigated. Patent data suggests that the answer is YES, but the characteristics that count the most might come as a surprise. 

Background on Patent Examiner Variability

It is important to understand that not all USPTO patent examiners are the same; there is a large discrepancy between examiners who grant a lot of patents compared to those who are unlikely to grant a patent. In fact, half of all USPTO patents are issued by only 10% of the total patent examiner pool. On the flip side, there is a group of patent examiners comprising 20% of the total examiner pool that issues only 0.6% of all USPTO patents.   

Myths of Litigated Patents-Image 1

 

Within our patent analytics platform, LexisNexis PatentAdvisor®, we use a proprietary algorithm, PatentAdvisor ETA™ (Examiner Allowance Rate), to predict patent examiner behavior and to classify USPTO patent examiners as either “red,” “yellow” or “green.” On one end of the spectrum of examiner difficulty, red patent examiners are the most difficult to face, and require more time and resources for patent applicants to overcome. On the other end of the spectrum, green patent examiners are the least difficult and issue patents more quickly than red or yellow patent examiners. Yellow patent examiners fall somewhere between red and green patent examiners in terms of difficulty.

Dr. Tu started his research with three hypotheses (myths:)

1.Examiners who have high allowance rates will issue more (than expected) litigated patents.  

2.Examiners who issue very few patents will issue less litigated patents.

3.Examiners with the least amount of experience will issue litigated patents at a higher than expected rate.

Rational thinkers may conclude that the examiners who issue patents the quickest are more likely to issue weak patents, and, therefore, that quick patent examiners are the most likely to have their patents litigated. Despite making a lot of sense, this is simply not the case. 

Litigation Correlation: Myths vs. Reality

There are actually quite a few logical assumptions about patent litigation that we can debunk using USPTO patent data. Myth number one is that patents issued by patent examiners with high allowance rates are more likely to be litigated; but the reality is that there is little correlation between examiner allowance rates and patent litigation rates. Similarly, the second myth is that patent examiners who issue few patents have a lower rate of litigation. Once again, it makes sense that examiners who take their time on each patent application might issue less litigated patents, but USPTO data shows no meaningful correlation. The third myth is that litigated patents are more likely to come from patent examiners with the least amounts of examination experience.  

Dr. Tu’s research dispelled the myths with these facts: 

  • High allowance rate examiners issue a lower than expected rate of litigated patents. 
  • Low allowance rate examiners issue an expected amount of litigated patents.  
  • Primary patent examiners who are no longer supervised issue a disproportionally high rate of litigated patents. 

A Correlation Between Examiner Experience and Litigation

Dr. Tu found that there actually is a correlation between examiner experience and litigation, but it is not as straightforward as one might think. 

The meaningful correlation that does exist is that patent examiners with three to six years of experience are the most likely to issue patents that are later litigated. Why? For most patent examiners, there is a transition that occurs from a highly supervised junior attorney to a “primary” patent examiner. As supervision fades, but before patent examiners really become comfortable with their autonomy and the technology they evaluate, there is a spike in the issuance of patents that arguably should have been rejected.  

Myths of Litigated Patents-Image 2

 

In the world of patent data, we live for meaningful correlations. Patent tools like the PatentAdvisor™ patent analytics platform help users identify correlations so they can adapt their patent strategies to obtain the best possible outcomes.  

To learn more about the correlation between patent litigation rates and examiner experience, check out our webinar, “Myths of Litigated Patents,” now available on demand. Access the slide presentation here 

Previous webinars mentioned during the presentation: 

Additional research studies by Dr. Tu mentioned during the presentation: 

 

Learn more about PatentAdvisor exclusive patent analysis tools, and PatentAdvisor ETA™,  the single most informative metric for predicting patent examiner behavior  

  

LexisNexis PatentAdvisor®

7 Day Trial

Get to know your examiner better with more context and a deeper understanding of your examiner’s behavior than ever available before.

With your free trial, you will gain instant access to:

Examiner Search allows you to search by examiner name for a filterable, examiner specific dashboard of patent analytics, including rejection specific statistics, appeal statistics, prosecution statistics, interview statistics, a backlog of RCEs and timeline.

QuickPair easily replaces the USPTO Public PAIR by providing the most robust application details anywhere, including examiner timeline, examiner allowance rate and the average time and number of office actions to allowance.

PatentAdvisor, the first-ever data-driven patent strategy tool, provides a systemic approach to crafting an effective prosecution strategy. Understand why certain patent applications take longer than others to reach allowance—then use that knowledge to devise better patent prosecution strategies.

Free Trial

Latest IP News & Analysis:

LexisNexis는 전 세계 조직이 UN SDGs에 대한 혁신 기여도를 객관적으로 추적하고 보고할 수 있도록 하는 새로운 지속 가능한 혁신 측정 프레임워크를 출시합니다.

UN 지속 가능한 개발 목표 프레임워크에 대한 특허 데이터의 업계 최초 정렬은 지속 가능한 혁신 분석에 혁명을 일으켰습니다. 12 October 2021, New York, United States — LexisNexis® Legal & Professional은 글로벌 특허 시스템을 UN Sustainable에 매핑하여 지속 가능한 중심의 혁신을 식별하고, 검색하고, 추적할 수 있도록 하는 선도적인 지적 재산권 분석 솔루션인...

When IP Meets Sustainability: Mapping Patents to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

By Marco Richter, Global Lead Product & Customer Success, LexisNexis Intellectual Property Solutions  Once considered a matter for governments and international organizations like the United Nations (UN), sustainability is now unquestionably a topic of major...

LexisNexis 推出新的可持续创新衡量体系,助力全球组织客观地跟踪和报告其创新对联合国可持续发展目标的贡献

业内首创:将专利数据与联合国可持续发展目标框架相结合,为可持续创新分析带来革新美国纽约 2021 年 10 月 12 日电 – 律商联讯集团 (LexisNexis® Legal & Professional) 宣布推出基于 LexisNexis® PatentSight® 的知识产权分析解决方案的创新扩展,将全球专利制度与联合国可持续发展目标 (UN Sustainable Development Goals, UN SDGs)...

LexisNexis는 전 세계 조직이 UN에 대한 혁신 기여를 객관적으로 추적하고 보고할 수 있도록 하는 새로운 지속 가능한 혁신 측정 프레임워크를 출시합니다 SDGs.

業界初、特許データを国連のSDGsの枠組みにマッピングすることで、持続可能なイノベーションの分析に革命を起こします。2021年10月12日, 米国ニューヨーク — LexisNexis® Legal & Professionalは、同社の知的財産分析ソリューションを代表するLexisNexis® PatentSight®のイノベーティブな機能を発表しました。世界の特許を国連の持続可能な開発目標(UN...

LexisNexis launches new Sustainable Innovation Measurement framework enabling organizations globally to objectively track and report on innovation’s contribution to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

Industry-first alignment of patent data to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals framework revolutionizes sustainable innovation analysis.12 October 2021, New York, United States — LexisNexis® Legal & Professional is pleased to announce the launch of an...