Quality patents are assets to everyone. The patent system is at its peak when high-quality patents and patent applications make up the USPTO’s archives. Inventors are incentivized to share their innovations with the world knowing they will be protected in doing so, and investors are more likely to back an idea that is protected by a strong, defensible patent. Quality patents result in a healthy system where patent rights are certain and disputes are easily settled. The only question is “what are the qualities that make up a quality patent?”

“. . . one aspect of quality is meeting the legal standards of utility, novelty, non-obviousness, written description, enablement and definiteness.”

1. Effectively Meets Legal Standards

Recently, the Director of the USPTO defined quality patents as “those that are issued in compliance with all the requirements of Title 35 of the United States Code as well as relevant case law at the time of issuance.” In other words, one aspect of quality is meeting the legal standards of utility, novelty, non-obviousness, written description, enablement and definiteness. Inventors and patent applicants who file patent documents that meet legal standards are less likely to need to spend time and money on: 

    • Office Actions and Patent Examiner Correspondence. Responding to an office action is estimated to cost an average of $3,000 each time. Patent applications that meet legal standards receive fewer rejections and cost less to prosecute.
    • Pre-Issuance Submissions. The America Invents Act (AIA) introduced many new changes impacting patent practice; including giving third parties the ability to submit prior art for consideration by patent examiners before a patent application receives its first substantive office action. Trends show that companies are more heavily monitoring patent filings and are more readily filing pre-issuance submissions to help weed out patent applications that fall short of legal standards.
    • Post-Grant Reviews. Interested third parties can use post-grant reviews to cancel one or more claims of a patent on any ground relating to invalidity. Patents that meet legal standards are both less likely to be challenged and are more likely to survive post-grant reviews.

Learn how to create high-quality patent applications.

2. Effectively Captures and Articulates the Invention

Quality patents are clearly written and readily understood. Well-articulated patents create clear boundaries that help others determine what actions they can take to avoid committing infringement, and they help businesses define a reasonable course for product development. Ambiguity, on the other hand, is more likely to lead to multiple interpretations of patent language, and may even lead to legal disputes. To foster innovation and reduce litigation, patent practitioners should focus on drafting patents that clearly articulate the underlying invention and the scope of its protection.

Download the white paper Patent Quality: It’s Now or Never.

3. Contributes to Relative Market Value

An invention’s value is partly determined by how much revenue it generates compared to how much expense goes into it. Keeping down patent prosecution expenses by drafting a clearly written patent that meets legal standards is one way to increase an invention’s relative market value. Additionally, having a strong patent in place to protect an invention is attractive to investors, while an aggregation of low-quality patents granted by the USPTO reduces investors’ faith in the patent system and lessens the pool of investment for everyone.

See how to reduce client costs with LexisNexis PatentOptimizer.

Producing Quality Patents with tools from LexisNexis® Intellectual Property

There are many things patent practitioners can do to improve the quality of their patents, but the quickest and most effective way to improve patent quality is through the use of LexisNexis PatentOptimizer®. Improve your patent drafting by easily identifying a lack of sufficient written descriptions, identifying vague and indefinite claim language, identifying claim terms that lack proper antecedent basis, identifying functional claim language without the recitation of corresponding structure in the specification, and detecting and correcting inconsistent part names and numbers. PatentOptimizer™ helps patent practitioners address issues that produce low-quality patent applications and helps increase the quality of the patent system for everyone.

Explore how to write high-quality patents with precision.

Learn more about PatentOptimizer and find training documents and videos here.

Develop Well-Tailored Patent Applications

Discover the patent analytics tool built for better patent drafting and dissection of issued patents.


The Effects of Efficient Patent Drafting

Patent prosecution is a marathon that demands quality performance every step of the way. The way patent professionals approach the many hours they spend on patent searches, prior art analyses, and patent application drafting has implications that can last for years...

Integration of Automation in the Patent Process

Automation has come a long way in a short amount of time, thanks to developments in big data, machine learning, robotics and the Internet of Things. Many people and businesses have grown accustomed to having software and machines perform tasks that humans once...

Performance Checks to Provide Better Patent Services

Improvement is iterative. It often arises from an accumulation of small changes that stem from experience and self-awareness. Before making changes, one must first be aware of steps that will likely lead to better results. Performance checks help to identify issues to...

Anatomy of an Office Action: Reduce Client Costs with LexisNexis PatentOptimizer®

The idea that we should focus our attention on things that are within our control and worry little about the things that are not, is a philosophy that spans ages. It is also a philosophy that is particularly valuable in patent prosecution. Patent professionals have...

Prior Art Research

Conducting prior art research before filing a patent application can have a profound influence on patent strategies and outcomes. Not only can understanding prior art help to determine whether an invention is patentable, but it can also inform how a patent application...

Patent Analysis Tools for Objective Application Review

Why is it so hard to be objective when reviewing our work? For patent practitioners, a comprehensive, objective application review before it is submitted to the USPTO—a check on both substance and form—can help to avoid many headaches down the road. Yet, despite the...