Patent Prosecution Analytics: No Longer Just a Nice to Have

Sep 30, 2021

Patent Prosecution Analytics: No Longer Just a Nice to Have

In a recent webinar, the LexisNexis® Intellectual Property team offered patent practitioners several convincing reasons for integrating patent prosecution analytics into their processes. Patent data and analytics can be leveraged in many ways throughout patent prosecution to help patent professionals evaluate the difficulty of their patent examiners, objectively assess their performances in dealing with the USPTO and extract information from the USPTO archives that can be used to obtain favorable outcomes for patent clients.

Predicting Patent Prosecution Outcomes Using PatentAdvisor ETA™

The PatentAdvisor ETA proprietary patent metric, available on the LexisNexis PatentAdvisor® patent analytics platform, has proven itself a superior method of predicting the behavior of USPTO patent examiners. Whereas many commonly used patent statistics fail to account for important examiner-specific information, the proprietary PatentAdvisor ETA algorithm yields a more comprehensive and reliable measurement of examiner difficulty. While statistics, such as patent examiner allowance rates, fail to account for actions examiners have taken on pending patent applications, these actions are an important part of the calculations. Moreover, a PatentAdvisor ETA value does a better job communicating an examiner’s most recent decision trends (as opposed to just looking at career statistical averages) and does not penalize examiners for patent application abandonments, since they could result from applicants’ decisions rather than the examiner’s actions.

Using PatentAdvisor ETA values, patent examiners can be categorized as being “permissive,” “moderate” or “difficult.”. The value and category assigned to a patent examiner indicate the number of office actions an examiner is expected to issue, the duration of time an application will remain pending and the likelihood that an examiner will ultimately grant an application. As a result, patent professionals can use PatentAdvisor ETA prosecution analytics to better understand the examiners they face and better predict the obstacles that lie ahead.

PatentAdvisor ETA

Learn more about how to use patent data to understand USPTO examiners.

Evaluating Patent Prosecution Performance

When PatentAdvisor ETA examiner categories are used to evaluate the proportions of the types of patent examiners in each USPTO art unit, many are surprised to find that examiners are not evenly or consistently distributed. Some art units are more “stacked” with difficult examiners, making it harder for patent professionals who routinely deal with those art units to obtain patent protection for their clients. Understanding that there is significant variability among patent examiners is important for patent professionals who want to accurately assess their patent prosecution performance and the performance of their law firms.

Patent Analytics Chart

For each patent application that is prosecuted, the type of examiner that is faced is what sets the bar for whether a patent attorney’s performance is respectable or subpar. For example, receiving three office actions from an “easy” examiner might be considered a poor performance, whereas receiving a grant from a “difficult” examiner might be a success, even if five office actions were issued. The PatentAdvisor™ Efficiency Score provides the prosecution analytics to evaluate prosecution performance as a metric that has been normalized for examiner difficulty. By taking into account examiner difficulty and the outcomes that are statistically the most likely to occur, each PatentAdvisor Efficiency Score value helps practitioners understand how far above or below average their performance is compared to others. With this information, patent professionals can rely on objective feedback to improve their performance for future patent applications.

Explore how to use patent prosecution analytics for predictions, performance and evaluations.

Engaging PTAB “Case Law” to Find Winning Arguments

When a patent practitioner has reached the end of the road with their assigned patent examiner, they should consider whether filing for appeal is worth pursuing. Naturally, the decision whether to appeal often hinges on a practitioner’s confidence that they will be able to convince the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to reverse their patent examiner’s decision. LexisNexis IP now makes it easier than ever for patent professionals to determine the level of confidence they should possess in an appeal scenario. 

Patent practitioners can now easily navigate their way through the many arguments that have been historically presented to address issues that have been reviewed by the PTAB. Practitioners can navigate a hierarchical list of PTAB arguments that have been presented, beginning with specific rejection types at the highest level (e.g., Section 101, 102, 103, 112, etc.) and narrowing down to much more granular issues (e.g., whether an idea is “abstract”). In navigating the various arguments that could apply to a practitioner’s appeal, practitioners can review past performance statistics to determine how successful certain arguments have been in the past—in overturning USPTO patent examiner opinions, generally, as well as in overturning the opinions of a specific examiner. By using LexisNexis IP patent prosecution analytics tools, practitioners can come up with potential strategies based on PTAB “case law,” and use historical patent data to decide whether or not the odds of overturning their examiner’s opinion are in their favor.

Read How Ex Parte PTAB Decision Data Helps to Streamline Prosecution Processes to learn more.

Patent Prosecution PTAB

Patent data and prosecution analytics can be leveraged in many ways throughout patent prosecution, and LexisNexis IP provides the tools to give patent professionals the leverage they need. For more information on how to use LexisNexis IP products throughout patent prosecution or how to integrate patent prosecution data into your workflow, please check out the “Patent Prosecution Analytics: No Longer Just a Nice to Have” on-demand webinar.

See how to Supplement PatentAdvisor ETA™ Predictions With Additional Patent Statistics.

Learn more about PatentAdvisor and download the PatentAdvisor ETA datasheet.

Unique Features of PatentAdvisor

PatentAdvisor ETA™
The most accurate predictor of patent examiner behavior that factors in all pending applications, examiner’s experience and is driven by the examiner’s behaviors, not the filers’ actions.
Examiner Lottery Framework™
Use the Examiner Lottery Framework to craft a more effective, systematic prosecution strategy with comprehensive patent analysis tools based on the context of the entire USPTO.
LexisNexis PatentAdvisor® for Law Firms

Help your clients improve patent prosecution outcomes and gain a competitive advantage.

LexisNexis PatentAdvisor® for Corporations
A systematic approach to managing your outside counsel and patent portfolio.

When Patent Applications Linger In Prosecution

Bad things happen when patent applications linger in prosecution for too long. Patent applications tend to get stuck between filing and issuance only when significant obstacles arise. Obstacles, such as office actions issued by the patent office, are costly and can be...

Pop Culture Patents: The Modern Space Race

The modern space race looks much different than its predecessor. Rather than a battle among government superpowers, the competition to travel even further into space is now being led by the private sector. Innovative, big-dreaming billionaires have taken the reins and...

A Perspective on Artificial Intelligence Patent Applications

The topic of artificial intelligence (AI) is practically inescapable these days. AI broadly refers to technologies and systems comprised of software or hardware that perform tasks and iteratively improve themselves based on the information they collect. Regardless of...

What To Do After a Final Office Action

Patent professionals can only argue with their patent examiners for so long before an examiner issues a "final" office action. Fortunately, receiving a final office action does not mean the end of hope for patent applicants. Filing either a Request for Continued...

NEW: Access Examiner Analytics from the USPTO PAIR and Patent Center Websites

Researchers and consumers expect quick, easy access to information and items via intuitive interfaces. Similarly, software developers constantly grapple with the concept of "friction" when trying to design a pleasant user experience. Simply put, friction is anything...

Patent Analysis Tools for Intellectual Property Counsel

Whether you work as in-house or outside intellectual property counsel, patent portfolio management tends to be an area ripe for improvement. Managing many patent projects and the work of multiple patent professionals is inherently challenging when you don’t have the...