How to Compare Patent Prosecution Performances

May 24, 2021

Featured Image-How to Compare Patent Prosecution Performances

Comparing the effectiveness of two patent practitioners can be like comparing apples to oranges. The success of a patent application is dependent on many factors that are beyond a patent practitioner’s control, which makes it difficult to compare patent prosecution performances throughout the patent process. For example, one might initially conclude that Practitioner A, who has an 80% patent allowance rate, is more successful than Practitioner B with a 70% allowance rate. However, it is hard to be certain who is more successful, since Practitioner A’s patent applications could have been evaluated by more patent-friendly patent examiners.  

The LexisNexis PatentAdvisor® patent prosecution platform not only offers a solution for understanding USPTO patent examiner difficulty levels, but it also allows patent practitioners to communicate how their patent performance stacks up against competitors to help win over prospective clients. 

Normalizing Examiner Difficulty With PatentAdvisor ETA™ 

The biggest challenge in comparing the success of two patent practitioners is analyzing the difficulty of the patent examiners they have faced. Each USPTO patent examiner varies in their experience levels, the technologies they evaluate and their knowledge. To further complicate matters, each patent examiner’s difficulty level fluctuates throughout their career. Traditional  patent statistics fail to account for all of these variables, and can therefore, be poor gauges of examiner difficulty. Determining patent examiner difficulty levels can be done with an original patent metric produced using a sophisticated algorithm that takes into account the circumstances surrounding patent prosecution; more specifically, the PatentAdvisor ETA exclusive metric. 

With PatentAdvisor™, users can access each USPTO patent examiner’s ETA value to determine their relative difficulty compared to all other USPTO patent examiners. Higher ETA values are associated with difficult patent examiners and indicate long patent prosecution durations and higher volumes of office actions. The PatentAdvisor platform also labels patent examiners as either “green,” “yellow” or “red” based on their ETA scores, which allows users to quickly determine if their assigned examiners are relatively easy, moderate or difficult, respectively. 

 

ETA

 

PatentAdvisor Efficiency Score™ and Practitioner Performance

With an effective way of determining USPTO examiner difficulty levels, the opportunity to evaluate the performance of patent practitioners presents itself. A measure of examiner difficulty levels produces a better understanding of how patent prosecution is likely to proceed against a specific patent practitioner. PatentAdvisor compares the actual performance of each patent application against its expected performance, and the performance is then scored based on how far it exceeds or falls below expectations. The scores of all the patent applications prosecuted by a patent practitioner are then combined to produce their Efficiency Score™the best basis for comparing the performances of patent practitioners. 

See how to compare counsel and companies with patent analytics.

 

Overall Score

 

Without PatentAdvisor ETA and Efficiency Score metrics comparing patent practitioners can be like comparing apples to oranges. PatentAdvisor proprietary algorithms and patent metrics help users evaluate examiner difficulties and performances against individual USPTO patent examiners. With objective measures of success in patent prosecution, patent practitioners can better evaluate their performances against those of competing practitioners, helping them to better present themselves and win over prospective patent clients. 

Learn more about how to use patent data to understand USPTO examiners.

Download the PatentAdvisor ETA datasheet here 

When Patent Applications Linger In Prosecution

Bad things happen when patent applications linger in prosecution for too long. Patent applications tend to get stuck between filing and issuance only when significant obstacles arise. Obstacles, such as office actions issued by the patent office, are costly and can be...

How Net Zero Energy Research Translates Into Real-World Applications

In a recent webinar, we discussed our analysis of current and projected worldwide innovation and investment trends spurred by the United Nations–endorsed “net zero” mandate to zero out greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Net zero will be a significant driver of both...

The Effects of Efficient Patent Drafting

Patent prosecution is a marathon that demands quality performance every step of the way. The way patent professionals approach the many hours they spend on patent searches, prior art analyses, and patent application drafting has implications that can last for years...

Celebrating World Intellectual Property Day 2022: IP and Youth Innovating for A Better Future

Business and technology themes typically drive IP and innovation conversations. We seek to answer questions like, what does this mean for the bottom line or the race to exclusivity? But there is no more critical forward-looking focus than how IP plays a role in...

Pop Culture Patents: The Modern Space Race

The modern space race looks much different than its predecessor. Rather than a battle among government superpowers, the competition to travel even further into space is now being led by the private sector. Innovative, big-dreaming billionaires have taken the reins and...