Create High-Quality Patent Applications with LexisNexis® PatentOptimizer®

Jul 22, 2021

High-quality patent applications
As patent professionals, how do we define successful patent prosecution? Surely, we strive for more than simply obtaining a patent for our client. It is also important that our clients’ patent rights are unambiguous and enforceable, and that our jobs are performed efficiently so that every client dollar counts. Modern patent drafting tools like LexisNexis® PatentOptimizer® integrate seamlessly with our favorite word processing tools to ensure that each of our patent applications is high-quality before they are submitted for examination.

Avoiding Deficiencies that Lead to Office Actions

If a patent practitioner’s minimum objective is to ensure client patents are ultimately granted, then professionals must ensure that all of the office actions issued by the USPTO are successfully overcome. In other words, patent professionals must be certain that their patent applications contain all of the essential qualities or elements required for patentability. However, if we aim a little bit higher for a high-quality application, patent professionals can avoid the rejections and objections that commonly obstruct the path to issuance by utilizing effective patent application drafting and review processes. When an office action is issued containing a rejection, the assigned patent examiner has determined that there are issues with the merits of the underlying patent claims, so the examiner refuses to grant because the claimed subject matter has been deemed unpatentable (based on the laws of Title 35 of the U.S. Code). An objection, on the other hand, arises when a patent examiner takes issue with a patent application’s form (based on the requirements of Title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations) Learn how PatentOptimizer® can suggest arguments and help users build effective office action responses in three simple steps by reading Using USPTO Archives to Generate Office Action Responses. The PatentOptimizer patent analysis and drafting tools help patent practitioners avoid the Section 112 rejections and objections by performing comprehensive checks of patent drafts and identifying issues before a patent application is submitted. Among many of the PatentOptimizer features, users can check patent claims for proper antecedent basis or a lack of support in the disclosure, and they can check the parts of their patent applications for accuracy and inconsistencies that could trigger office actions throughout the patent process, resulting in a high-quality application. Read Drafting Quality Patents to Avoid §112 Rejections to learn more.
High-quality screen

Moving Beyond Sufficient to High-Quality

It is time for patent professionals to aim much higher than producing patent applications that just meet the minimum patentability requirement. Producing high-quality patents means clients are much less likely to wind up in litigation. Moreover, the ability to maintain efficient patent drafting processes without compromising patent quality means that patent clients will be happier and client relationships can thrive.

PatentOptimizer tools allow patent practitioners to produce high-quality patents in less time than ever. Convenient features such as a built-in patent thesaurus allow users to search and navigate a matter index of patent part terminology and find prior art support for claim construction. Users can also save time by inserting fully formatted patent citations into their patent documents with the click of a button, automatically update amended claim numbering and dependencies, and even quickly generate completed USPTO information disclosure statement forms for users.

Learn more about PatentOptimizer tools in Integrating for Better Performance With LexisNexis PatentOptimizer®.

The features contained in PatentOptimizer are seemingly endless. PatentOptimizer drafting tools enable patent professionals to move the bar and maintain higher standards when it comes to patent prosecution. Patent professionals can avoid delays and headaches caused by patent examiner office actions and can instead provide clients with high-quality patents that are cost-effective and enforceable.

Learn more about how to save time and easily develop well-tailored, concise, high-quality patent applications with a case study of how one IP firm was able to ensure better quality application in less time by using PatentOptimizer. Request Case Study

Learn more about PatentOptimizer here.

Access PatentOptimizer training documents and videos here.

New Call-to-action

Integration of Automation in the Patent Process

Automation has come a long way in a short amount of time, thanks to developments in big data, machine learning, robotics and the Internet of Things. Many people and businesses have grown accustomed to having software and machines perform tasks that humans once...

Performance Checks to Provide Better Patent Services

Improvement is iterative. It often arises from an accumulation of small changes that stem from experience and self-awareness. Before making changes, one must first be aware of steps that will likely lead to better results. Performance checks help to identify issues to...

Anatomy of an Office Action: Reduce Client Costs with LexisNexis PatentOptimizer®

The idea that we should focus our attention on things that are within our control and worry little about the things that are not, is a philosophy that spans ages. It is also a philosophy that is particularly valuable in patent prosecution. Patent professionals have...

Prior Art Research

Conducting prior art research before filing a patent application can have a profound influence on patent strategies and outcomes. Not only can understanding prior art help to determine whether an invention is patentable, but it can also inform how a patent application...

Patent Analysis Tools for Objective Application Review

Why is it so hard to be objective when reviewing our work? For patent practitioners, a comprehensive, objective application review before it is submitted to the USPTO—a check on both substance and form—can help to avoid many headaches down the road. Yet, despite the...

Evaluate Patent Portfolios Based on Quantity and Quality

What is the best way to evaluate a patent portfolio? Do you take the phrase literally and evaluate a portfolio based on the number of patents it contains, or is there a better way? The LexisNexis® PatentSight® innovation analytics platform offers multiple tools and...