Avoiding Section 112(b) Rejections With Patent Drafting Tools

Dec 29, 2020

Featured Image-Avoiding Section 112 (b) Rejections With Patent Drafting Tools

Avoiding Section 112(b) Rejection

One of the most important jobs performed by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and its patent examiners is to ensure that the patents they issue make it clear to the public exactly what invention is being protected. Giving the public notice of the boundaries of patent subject matter is critical for both fostering innovation and raising confidence in the patent process. When a patents scope is not clear, readers of the patent may have a hard time discerning what the inventor regards as the invention, which can give rise to patent infringement lawsuits that could otherwise be avoided. 

Section 112(b) of Title 35 of the United States Code is one of the main vehicles used to ensure a certain level of clarity is achieved through the patent process. The second paragraph of Section 112(b) requires that patent applications point out and distinctly claim what the inventor regards as the invention. As such, claim language must be definite, and instances when a patent examiner determines a claim to be indefinite result in Section 112(b) rejections that must be resolved by the patent applicant. 

35 U.S.C. 112(b)—“The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. 

Well-drafted patent applications are the key to avoiding Section 112(b) rejections. Patent professionals should confirm before submission to the USPTO that none of their patent claim language is vague or ambiguous, and, ideally, that the specification will support any terms used in the claims by serving as a glossary, so patent examiners and the public can easily ascertain their meanings. When patent claim elements misuse indefinite articles or are not supported by the specification, they can be said to have no antecedent basis. A lack of an antecedent basis could be evidence of indefiniteness and could also trigger a Section 112(b) rejection. 

What Happens When I Receive a Section 112(b) Rejection?

Fortunately for patent professionals and patent applicants, issues with indefiniteness or a lack of antecedent basis are not usually fatal. When a Section 112(b) rejection is issued, patent examiners are expected to lay out the specific term or phrase that they consider to be indefinite and the rationale behind their opinion. It is also their duty to work with patent applicants in a positive and constructive way to resolve Section 112(b) issues. Patent applicants are allowed to amend ambiguous claims and amend patent descriptions to provide clear support or antecedent basis for the claim terms they use. Even though indefiniteness can often be remedied, all rejections come at a cost. Not only do rejections cost time and money to overcome (the average office action response costs $3,000 to patent applicants), they also delay the conclusion of the patent process and the eventual issue date of the patent at issue. 

Avoiding Section 112(b) Rejections With Patent Drafting Tools

Avoiding Section 112(b) Rejections With LexisNexis PatentOptimizer®

Section 112(b) rejections are avoidable by drafting with definiteness in mind, and through thorough reviews of patent drafts before submission to the USPTO. Thorough reviews can be done manually, but the time it takes for a person to perform a full-scale check can also be costly. Patent drafting tools like PatentOptimizer® provide a more effective, automated alternative to manual reviews. The PatentOptimizer toolbar is available on Microsoft® Word and other word processors commonly used for patent drafting. The toolbar includes many features, such as the autogeneration of a Summary Report that captures all the anomalies detected by PatentOptimizer. To help address Section 112(b) issues, the Check Claims feature identifies terms and phrases that are used in claims that are not found elsewhere in the patent document, and the Check Terms feature identifies terms and phrases that could be construed as vague or indefinite. 

Patent professionals who use PatentOptimizer have the power to improve the quality of their patents quickly, with many patent drafting tools and features. Patent applications can be reviewed efficiently, helping patent applicants avoid mistakes and issues throughout the patent process. By addressing definiteness and a lack of antecedent basis before submission to the USPTO, patent professionals can avoid patent prosecution delays and save their clients money. 

Learn more about the PatentOptimizer patent claim analysis and patent writing software by reading Rejection is Nothing to Fear and Patent Drafting Tools: Three Key Advantages. Access the On-Demand Webinar Patent Drafting Tips for Avoiding and Arguing 112 Rejections here. Find PatentOptimizer resources here.  

New Call-to-action

LexisNexis는 전 세계 조직이 UN SDGs에 대한 혁신 기여도를 객관적으로 추적하고 보고할 수 있도록 하는 새로운 지속 가능한 혁신 측정 프레임워크를 출시합니다.

UN 지속 가능한 개발 목표 프레임워크에 대한 특허 데이터의 업계 최초 정렬은 지속 가능한 혁신 분석에 혁명을 일으켰습니다. 12 October 2021, New York, United States — LexisNexis® Legal & Professional은 글로벌 특허 시스템을 UN Sustainable에 매핑하여 지속 가능한 중심의 혁신을 식별하고, 검색하고, 추적할 수 있도록 하는 선도적인 지적 재산권 분석 솔루션인...

When IP Meets Sustainability: Mapping Patents to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

By Marco Richter, Global Lead Product & Customer Success, LexisNexis Intellectual Property Solutions  Once considered a matter for governments and international organizations like the United Nations (UN), sustainability is now unquestionably a topic of major...

LexisNexis 推出新的可持续创新衡量体系,助力全球组织客观地跟踪和报告其创新对联合国可持续发展目标的贡献

业内首创:将专利数据与联合国可持续发展目标框架相结合,为可持续创新分析带来革新美国纽约 2021 年 10 月 12 日电 – 律商联讯集团 (LexisNexis® Legal & Professional) 宣布推出基于 LexisNexis® PatentSight® 的知识产权分析解决方案的创新扩展,将全球专利制度与联合国可持续发展目标 (UN Sustainable Development Goals, UN SDGs)...

LexisNexis는 전 세계 조직이 UN에 대한 혁신 기여를 객관적으로 추적하고 보고할 수 있도록 하는 새로운 지속 가능한 혁신 측정 프레임워크를 출시합니다 SDGs.

業界初、特許データを国連のSDGsの枠組みにマッピングすることで、持続可能なイノベーションの分析に革命を起こします。2021年10月12日, 米国ニューヨーク — LexisNexis® Legal & Professionalは、同社の知的財産分析ソリューションを代表するLexisNexis® PatentSight®のイノベーティブな機能を発表しました。世界の特許を国連の持続可能な開発目標(UN...

LexisNexis launches new Sustainable Innovation Measurement framework enabling organizations globally to objectively track and report on innovation’s contribution to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

Industry-first alignment of patent data to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals framework revolutionizes sustainable innovation analysis.12 October 2021, New York, United States — LexisNexis® Legal & Professional is pleased to announce the launch of an...