The Alice/Mayo framework for determining patent eligibility has made it much more difficult to obtain patents in a variety of technology fields, but until recently the futuristic area of artificial intelligence (AI) related innovation was largely spared from dealing with the most difficult of these rejections. Today, however, patent eligibility rejections for inventions claiming advances directed to AI are as common as §101 rejections of business method applications.

Listen as Gene Quinn, patent attorney and founder of IPWatchdog.com, joined by attorneys with Kilpatrick Townsend Kate Gaudry, PhD, and Samuel Hayim, discuss patent eligibility, artificial intelligence, why a decision in Electric Power Group is being used by patent examiners to reject AI patent claims and how patent practitioners can attempt to respond to these patent eligibility rejections.

Watch the Recording

Related Content

Webinar: Dissecting Alice at 5 – The Good, Bad & the Ugly Listen as Gene Quinn, President and CEO of IPWatchdog, Inc.hosts a special free webinar discussion focusing on the Alice decision five years later. Jo...
A Patent Examiner’s Take on ETA What might a USPTO examiner have to say about this new way to approach patent prosecution? The newest LexisNexis PatentAdvisor® metric has prov...
Webinar: AIA Best Practices: A Holistic Approach to Patent Preparation and Prosecution Listen as Gene Quinn, founder and president of IPWatchdog.com, John White, patent author, instructor and attorney and Mike Hudelson, Director of IP Pr...

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. Cookie Policy

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close