The Alice/Mayo framework for determining patent eligibility has made it much more difficult to obtain patents in a variety of technology fields, but until recently the futuristic area of artificial intelligence (AI) related innovation was largely spared from dealing with the most difficult of these rejections. Today, however, patent eligibility rejections for inventions claiming advances directed to AI are as common as §101 rejections of business method applications.

Listen as Gene Quinn, patent attorney and founder of IPWatchdog.com, joined by attorneys with Kilpatrick Townsend Kate Gaudry, PhD, and Samuel Hayim, discuss patent eligibility, artificial intelligence, why a decision in Electric Power Group is being used by patent examiners to reject AI patent claims and how patent practitioners can attempt to respond to these patent eligibility rejections.

Watch the Recording

Related Content

Improve your Prosecution Efficiency: How to Automate Office Action Responses – Webinar Recordi... Listen as David Stitzel, IP Solutions Consultant at LexisNexis IP, demonstrates how the Office Action Response tool can help you gain back time spen...
e-Mobility: Evaluating Top Patent Owners and Their Portfolios – Webinar Recording During this webinar, our expert consultants demonstrate how to derive useful and actionable insights from patent analytics that will provide your orga...
Setting the Tone of Prosecution with Patent Analytics There is no perfect formula for prosecuting a patent, but there is plenty of information out there that can be used to help anticipate a patent examin...

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. Cookie Policy

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close