Every patent practitioner knows that some examiners allow more patents than others, but most assume that the variability results from some combination of three factors: examiner experience, technology area and the merits of the applications brought before them. While all three of these factors influences examiner grant rates, they do not tell the whole story of the Examiner Lottery you play for each new application.

Watch this recording to learn the real reasons why some applications are treated differently from others, and what applicants can do about it.

Panelists Gene Quinn, Todd Dickinson and Megan McLoughlin discuss:

  • What the variability in examiner grant rates look like across the USPTO
  • What factors influence differences in grant rates
  • How to optimize prosecution outcomes with this knowledge

Watch the Recording

Related Content

Webinar: Drafting Software Patents: Lessons from Key Lighthouse Cases Listen as Gene Quinn, founder and president of IPWatchdog.com, John White, patent author and attorney and Dr. Kate Gaudry, partner at Kilpatrick Towns...
Patenting a Championship Innovations that Made the Super Bowl Safer and Cooler Super Bowl LIII is in the books with a record-breaking win. Like every Super Bowl before ...
Artificial Intelligence Patent Applications in the News Artificial Intelligence (AI) is creating much excitement for numerous industries thinking of new products and services with patent applications increa...
[if lte IE 8]
[if lte IE 8]

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. Cookie Policy

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close