In this webinar, you’ll get the story of how the USPTO first began systematically denying patentability to software inventions long before Alice v. CLS Bank International.

Panelists Chris Holt, Vice President of Patent Analytics, LexisNexis PatentAdvisor® and Megan McLoughlin, Product Director, PatentAdvisor™ discuss the following in detail:

  • Before Alice, a large number of examiners were consistently refusing to give patentable weight to “non-functional descriptive material”
  • Many of these examiners are now the same examiners that refuse to allow software applications in view of patentable subject matter standards that have arisen since the Alice decision
  • Some examiners are even now continuing to utilize the “non-functional descriptive material” rejection basis
  • The long-standing and obvious connection between assignment of an application to an art unit and aggressive utilization of the non-patentable subject matter rejection

Source: all ip

Related Content

Advanced Patent Analytics – Taking a Look into the Digital Crystal Ball – Webinar Recording Almost like a glance into the crystal ball.Advanced patent analytics reveal competitors years before market entry. Listen as Gene Quinn, founder and ...
Infographic: Examiner Lottery Framework™ The future of patent analytics has arrived. Are you ready? Patent examiner variability exists at every level of the Patent Office. Now you can ...
Overcome Variability at the USPTO with the Examiner Lottery Framework™ For decades, patent professionals have been working under the assumption that all patent examiners at the USPTO behave more or less the same way or th...
[if lte IE 8]
[if lte IE 8]

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. Cookie Policy

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close