How Ex Parte PTAB Decision Data Helps to Streamline Prosecution Processes

Jan 11, 2022

How Ex Parte PTAB Decision Data Helps to Streamline Prosecution Processes

A distinguishing strength of a good patent practitioner is the ability to analogize or discern similarities. The problem is that finite hours are available for sifting through thousands of pages of online resources to find the needed information. This is where help from curated patent data comes in. Last year the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) made more than 7,500 PTAB decisions—most resulting from a lengthy process that’s costly for prosecutors. Yet each PTAB decision can be an important resource to support and streamline the prosecution process.

Ex parte PTAB appeals data can help patent practitioners analogize to overcome a particular rejection. With the recently enhanced LexisNexis PatentAdvisor® PTAB Decision search, a savvy practitioner can simply input an examiner name or art unit, filter for reversals and then quickly distill which arguments and case law the board found persuasive in overturning an application’s current rejection.

PTAB Decision

Of course, just as reversals can be helpful for those seeking to overturn a particular rejection, affirmances can support the other side of patent prosecution. Analogizing using this kind of patent prosecution data (ex parte appeals) flows predictably for patent prosecution responses (Office Action responses, appeal briefs) because both the data and the responses are integrally rooted in patent prosecution. But the use case can apply in a way that users may not instinctively consider, extending to patent litigation.

A patent litigator can use ex parte appeals data to quickly find arguments and case law for invalidating a patent.

Any issued patent will have an examiner, an art unit and a technology class. Users simply input any of that patent’s metadata (e.g., technology class, examiner, art unit, technology center) into the enhanced PatentAdvisor™ PTAB Decision search and then filter for affirmances. Right away, you gain access to very recently decided cases where the board applied relevant case law for the technology in question.

So rather than keeping current on all Section 101 case law across all technologies, a practitioner can simply use effectively proven outcomes in related applications. Some discretion will be needed to see whether the board decision claims are similar to the claims of interest (to be analogized to), but the PTAB Decision search in PatentAdvisor quickly puts the needed set of information in front of you.

The dataset features ex parte appeal documents since 2007, tagged to 217 legal issues, enabling prosecutors to easily find winning arguments and get more reliable and relevant prosecution guidance. PTAB Decision data reveals the substance behind the statistics to guide specific response strategy and gives insights into additional information about examiner behavior that is beneficial throughout all stages of the prosecution process. The dataset is continuously updated and tagged with the relevant issues, using AI-supported algorithms, and validated by patent experts.

Structured and value-add patent data is incredibly useful in finding the best and most persuasive course of action to advance your case. This is true for the patent prosecutor, the examiner and the patent litigator.

Watch the on-demand webinar Patent Prosecution Analytics: No Longer Just a Nice to Have for a deep-dive presentation into prosecution insights only LexisNexis PatentAdvisor® can provide.

Learn more about PatentAdvisor PTAB Decision data.

When Patent Applications Linger In Prosecution

Bad things happen when patent applications linger in prosecution for too long. Patent applications tend to get stuck between filing and issuance only when significant obstacles arise. Obstacles, such as office actions issued by the patent office, are costly and can be...

Pop Culture Patents: The Modern Space Race

The modern space race looks much different than its predecessor. Rather than a battle among government superpowers, the competition to travel even further into space is now being led by the private sector. Innovative, big-dreaming billionaires have taken the reins and...

A Perspective on Artificial Intelligence Patent Applications

The topic of artificial intelligence (AI) is practically inescapable these days. AI broadly refers to technologies and systems comprised of software or hardware that perform tasks and iteratively improve themselves based on the information they collect. Regardless of...

What To Do After a Final Office Action

Patent professionals can only argue with their patent examiners for so long before an examiner issues a "final" office action. Fortunately, receiving a final office action does not mean the end of hope for patent applicants. Filing either a Request for Continued...

NEW: Access Examiner Analytics from the USPTO PAIR and Patent Center Websites

Researchers and consumers expect quick, easy access to information and items via intuitive interfaces. Similarly, software developers constantly grapple with the concept of "friction" when trying to design a pleasant user experience. Simply put, friction is anything...

Patent Analysis Tools for Intellectual Property Counsel

Whether you work as in-house or outside intellectual property counsel, patent portfolio management tends to be an area ripe for improvement. Managing many patent projects and the work of multiple patent professionals is inherently challenging when you don’t have the...