Megan and Chris evaluate the prosecution history of U.S. Patent No. 5,352,605, Monsanto’s patent on genetically modified soybeans that was at issue in Bowman v. Monsanto. Monsanto’s counsel for this patent application took a very aggressive prosecution strategy—appealing after the first final office action—and it paid off. In what other situations could such an aggressive appeal strategy make statistical sense?

Segment Type: Patents that launched an empire

Listener Mail: Common objection to using patent data

Join Our Podcast Email List

 

We’ll send you an email every time there’s a new episode published.

Related Content

#54: Shades of Red Chris talks with Megan about his recent experience deciding how to respond to a first office action. He discovered that his application has ended up w...
#53: A Patent Examiner’s Take on ETA Having devoted years to developing examiner metrics that are both accurate and fair, Chris and Megan figured it made sense to ask for an examiner's pe...
#52: Inside Scoop with Former Patent Examiner Joshua Rudawitz Megan interviews patent attorney Josh Rudawitz about his experience as a patent examiner. Josh discusses his career path at the USPTO and shares valua...
[if lte IE 8]
[if lte IE 8]

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. Cookie Policy

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close