Chris and Megan interview guest speaker Professor Sean Tu, from the University of West Virginia, about his research on which examiners are most likely to issue litigated patents. Are these controversial patents mainly issued by junior or primary examiners – or both? Listen to the podcast to hear more about his surprising findings.

Segment Type: Interview

Listener Mail: “Stump the Chump” with Professor Sean Tu

Citations: Sean Tu. “Patent Examination and Litigation Outcomes.” Stanford Technology Law Review.

Join Our Podcast Email List

 

We’ll send you an email every time there’s a new episode published.

Related Content

#57: Pro se what? A Deep Dive into Art Unit 3649 Inspired by a listener's question, Chris and Megan do a deep dive into art unit 3649: the “pro se” art unit. The USPTO created this art unit in 20...
#56: Put the “Lawyer” Back in Patent Lawyer Patent practitioners typically turn to prosecution analytics to help them prosecute more efficiently. With the rise of fixed fees and a clientele ...
#55: Win the Patent Examiner Lottery Chris and Megan remind leaders about the new proprietary metric, ETA (Examiner Time Allocation) and introduce two new deeper dive metrics. Before you...
[if lte IE 8]
[if lte IE 8]

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. Cookie Policy

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close